Cultivating Epistemological Resilience Through Islamic Education in the Age of Deepfakes and Digital Manipulation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: The advent of generative artificial intelligence and sophisticated synthetic media has precipitated an unprecedented epistemological crisis in the modern information ecosystem. While contemporary discourse frequently frames deepfakes as a technological disruption or a legal challenge regarding digital defamation, such perspectives fail to capture the profound existential threat posed to shared reality. This digital manipulation represents a fundamental destabilization of how human societies construct, verify, and agree upon objective truth.
Purpose: This study aims to reconstruct the threat of deepfakes and digital manipulation not merely as a regulatory or technological challenge, but as an acute epistemological crisis that threatens the foundations of civilization. It seeks to formulate the concept of "Anti-Fitnah Pedagogy 2.0," which transforms the normative values of Islamic education into practical, forensic digital literacy instruments to safeguard the moral and intellectual integrity of the post-truth generation.
Methods: A qualitative normative and socio-epistemological approach is employed, integrating classical Islamic jurisprudence, contemporary media studies, and digital forensics. The study analyzes the psychological, social, and algorithmic barriers to information verification among digital natives. By synthesizing the principles of Maqasid Shari'ah—specifically the protection of intellect and dignity—with system dynamics models of misinformation spread, the research constructs a multi-layered pedagogical framework that bridges classical legal theory with modern digital forensic practices.
Results: The findings reveal that traditional approaches to digital literacy, which focus on functional technology skills or automated detection software, are structurally insufficient against the sophisticated epistemic threat of deepfakes. The analysis demonstrates that digital manipulation exploits confirmation bias, social proof mechanisms, and algorithmic echo chambers, neutralizing normative ethical injunctions. In response, "Anti-Fitnah Pedagogy 2.0" operationalizes the Qur'anic principles of tabayyun (verification) and sanad (chain of transmission) into a robust framework of critical-prophetic reasoning. This framework maps directly onto modern digital forensic standards—authenticity, integrity, reliability, and explainability—thereby transforming character education into a frontline defense mechanism.
Implication: Educational institutions must transition from treating digital literacy as an ancillary technical skill to positioning it as a core epistemological survival mechanism. The proposed framework provides a critical blueprint for character education curricula in the post-truth era, equipping learners not merely to detect visual manipulation, but to cultivate systemic epistemic agency and social intelligence.
Originality: This study offers a radical departure from existing literature by conceptualizing deepfakes through the lens of Islamic epistemology and digital forensics. By elevating tabayyun from a passive theological doctrine to an active, praxiological digital survival skill, this research introduces a paradigm shift in Islamic character education tailored for an era characterized by the collapse of evidentiary certainty.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adeoye, Moses Adeleke. “Hoaxes in Islamic Perspective: Qur’anic Solutions for Building an Anti-Hoax Society.” Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies 3, no. 1 (2025): 35–58.
Aghbari, Azza Al, Waqas Aman, Ali Tarhini, and Waseem Iqbal. “Believing the Unreal: A Systematic Review in Mapping Human Responses to Deepfakes through Empirical Evidence.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open 13 (2026): 102772. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102772.
Akbar, Hadi. “Future Interaction between Man and Robots from Islamic Perspective.” International Journal of Islamic Thought 13 (June 1, 2018). https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.06.2018.005.
Al-Busaidi, Adil S, Raghu Raman, Laurie Hughes, Mousa Ahmed Albashrawi, Tegwen Malik, Yogesh K Dwivedi, Thuraiya Al- Alawi, et al. “Redefining Boundaries in Innovation and Knowledge Domains: Investigating the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 9, no. 4 (2024): 100630. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100630.
Balasubramaniam, S, Vanajaroselin Chirchi, Seifedine Kadry, Moorthy Agoramoorthy, Senthilvel P Gururama, Kumar K Satheesh, and T A Sivakumar. “The Road Ahead: Emerging Trends, Unresolved Issues, and Concluding Remarks in Generative AI—a Comprehensive Review.” International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2024 (2024).
Chambers, Simone. “Truth, Deliberative Democracy, and the Virtues of Accuracy: Is Fake News Destroying the Public Sphere?” Political Studies 69, no. 1 (2021): 147–63.
Chesney, Bobby, and Danielle Citron. “Deep Fakes.” California Law Review 107, no. 6 (2019): 1753–1820.
Doherty, Camille. “The Danger of Deepfakes: Information Pollution and Epistemic Insecurity,” 2025.
Imam, Mahera, and N Manimekalai. “Gender Dynamics and the Misuse of Personal Data: Understanding Vulnerabilities in the Digital Age.” Journal of Development Policy and Practice 11, no. 1 (2026): 22–44.
Khan, Naseem, Tuan Nguyen, Amine Bermak, and Issa Khalil. “Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2507.21157, 2025.
Lutz, Nina, Joseph S Schafer, Priya Dhawka, Phil Tinn, and Kate Starbird. “With Visual Integrity and Care: A Framework for Mixed Methods Research on Visual Social Data.” In Proceedings of the 2026 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–24, 2026.
Majin, Graham. Truthophobia: How the Boomers Broke Journalism: The Story of the Death of Impartial and Objective News. Independent Publishing Network, 2023.
Moafa, Fahad Abdullah. “Digital Harassment And Cyberstalking In The Saudi Community: A Socio-Legal Analysis Of Risk Factors, Reporting Barriers, And Preventive Strategies.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN SIGNAL AND IMAGE SCIENCES, 2026, 327–39.
Newman, Saul. “Post-Truth, Postmodernism and the Public Sphere.” In Europe in the Age of Post-Truth Politics: Populism, Disinformation and the Public Sphere, 13–30. Springer, 2022.
Oliullah, Md, and H M Murtuza. “Exploring How Political Deepfakes Trigger Cognitive Processes and Downstream Psychological and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.” Computers in Human Behavior Reports 22 (2026): 101066. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2026.101066.
ul Hassan, Misbah, Hafiz Muhammad Hassan, and Mr Muhammad Abrar. “Hadith and the Challenges of the 21st Century: A Contemporary Perspective.” ASSAJ 3, no. 02 (2025): 2576–86.
Vivoda, Vlado. “There Is Nothing Artificial about Intelligence: Consciousness, Symbiosis and the Collapse of the Human–Machine Divide.” AI & SOCIETY, 2025, 1–10.